islamic tower hamets muslim Tower Hamlets
Justice John Mitting does it again and gain. and again (HOME)
(Sir John Edward Mitting 8.10.47) More Judge Mitting

Recent decisions made by the hapless buffoon John Mitting, reinforce the wide spread belief that his Liberal/left political leanings cloud his faltering mental faculties and judgment. He could be suffering from Alzheimer's as his cognitive and decision making abilities appear to fly in the face of Justice, Logic, common sence and the impartiality high court judges are expect to display.

Judge John Mitting
john mitting justice john mitting

This tragic & dangerous maniac 61 year old John Mitting contradicts himself in his summing up, and highlights his lack of understanding of the Human Rights act, that clearly states that the safety and security of a countries citizens takes precedence over an individuals human rights.
Qatada is a convicted terrorist in Jordan, he is not a UK citizen, he is in the UK illegally as he arrived on a false passport, he has known links to Al-Qaida. Qatada preaches extremism and was linked to at least one 911 mass murderer.
What else does Mitting's want? Of course Mittings like all the liberal judges will stick slavishly to artical 3 and this case (Chahal v UK 1996). Some one should tell Mittings times have changed since 1996 - 911/7/7Madrid Bali ? ?i. Then again, I doubt he is that sure what year it is( )

Radical Muslim preacher Abu Qatada granted bail in Britain

Radical Muslim preacher Abu Qatada accused of having close ties to al-Qaida was granted bail by a British immigration appeals commission Thursday.

Abu Qatada, who was jailed in 2002 over accusations that he played a key role in raising money for extremist groups and provided spiritual advice to militants planning terror attacks, will remain in custody until arrangements for his release are completed.

Judge John Mitting ruled the cleric should be released after the Court of Appeal ordered the government in April to stop extradition proceedings, claiming he faced the threat of torture if returned to his native Jordan.

But the judge acknowledged Qatada could pose a national security threat and imposed a strict 22-hour curfew, meaning he must be inside his home for all but two hours a day. Precise details of the curfew will be decided at another hearing, probably within two weeks, officials said.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she was extremely disappointed with the decision and would "take all steps necessary to protect the public."

The government has been attempting to deport Qatada to Jordan, where he was convicted in connection with two 1998 bombings. Smith said the government would continue its efforts to deport the preacher.

Qatada has been described by a Spanish judge as Osama bin Laden's "spiritual ambassador in Europe," and Britain says he has connections with al-Qaida, Egypt's Islamic Jihad and other terror groups. Officials claim he had links to shoe bomber Richard Reid and Zacarias Moussaoui, who was convicted for his role in the Sept. 11 attack.

David Davis, the opposition Conservative party spokesman on home affairs, said the case seriously undermines Britain's program to deport terror suspects.

Qatada has denied supporting terrorism and claims he would not receive a fair trial if sent to Jordan. He was jailed in Britain under anti-terrorism laws between 2002 and early 2005, then released and re-arrested in August 2005 to be held pending deportation to Jordan.




John Mitting

Sir John Edward Mitting

Sir John Mitting

Justice Mitting

Judge Mitting


Update 13th November 2012 - emm! still in the news Justice John Mitting and Abu Qatada. The never ending story - The human rights lawyers continue to have a multi-million pound bonanza from Qatada, not doubt the drinks wont be on Justice John Mitting when he meets QC Fitzgerald and Human rights layer Gareth Peirce in the private club they all attend..

Gareth Peirce greedy Left wing Liberal Human Rights Lawyer.

To think we have a new government, and a tory home secretary - I have lost count of how many home secretaries that have overseen over this saga - The only constants has been Mitting and Qatada and the £5000 an hour human rights defence team. MORE on Justice John Mitting and the most recent judgment.

Judge John Mittings backs free NHS care for asylum seekers
Last Updated: 2:09AM BST 14/04/2008
As many as 11,000 failed asylum seekers could qualify for free NHS treatment after a High Court judge declared that current regulations were "unlawful".

Justice John Mitting
Another Mitting howler as Algerian Torrorist released

The ruling by Mr Justice Mitting applies to asylum seekers who have had their claims turned down but who have become "ordinarily resident" in Britain because it would be unsafe for them to return to their native country.

It follows a legally aided case brought by a Palestinian asylum seeker who was initially refused free treatment for chronic liver disease.

The man, who is in his 30s and was named only as A, had challenged the decision of West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust to refuse him treatment unless he paid.

The refusal was in line with NHS charges regulations introduced by then health minister John Hutton in 2004.
judge Mitting with Osama bin Laden at a friends of Al Qaeda meeting


More than 11,000 failed asylum seekers could win right to free NHS care
Last updated at 01:06am on 11th April 2008

A failed asylum seeker is using human rights law to overturn a ban on receiving free Health Service treatment.

If the Palestinian man's legally-aided test case is successful, 11,000 failed refugees could be entitled to care worth tens of millions of pounds.

Anybody whose case has been rejected but cannot safely return home would benefit - leaving the Government's refusal to treat all types of illegal immigrant and failed asylum seeker in tatters.


Last night, critics warned the bill for the care could be the "straw that broke the back'" of an NHS struggling to cope with demand from British citizens.

The Department of Health is contesting the case and wants the claim to be thrown out.

In a two-day hearing which began yesterday, lawyers for the Palestinian - who has chronic liver disease - said denying NHS treatment to him and thousands of others in the same position was unfair.

The court was told the man, in his 30s, arrived in the UK from the West Bank three years ago and immediately applied for asylum. It was refused.

As a result, he was turned down for treatment at his local hospital in West London when he arrived seeking care. His barrister, Stephen Knafler, said: 'The current guidance is unlawful.

"It is because it excludes all failed asylum seekers and other persons from treatment without a positive immigration right to reside.

"It fails to advise that those who cannot pay for NHS treatment and who cannot reasonably be expected to leave the UK remain entitled to treatment.'

Mr Knafler said failed asylum seekers who cannot return home were entitled to free treatment for four reasons, including their human rights and the fact that they are effectively "ordinarily resident" in the UK because of their limbo-like situation.

In the case of the Palestinian, he cannot be returned because of the continued chaos in the West Bank and problems with documentation.

Mr Justice Mitting, presiding, was told he was not being asked to reach a decision solely on the man's case.

The verdict will impact on any failed asylum seeker who agrees to go but cannot be removed.

The man's solicitor, Adam Hundt of Pierce Glynn, said: "He has never broken the law and the Home Office recognises that it has to provide him with accommodation so as not to breach his human rights.

"It seems perverse that housing is considered a basic human right and that healthcare is not."


Decision: Mr Justice Mitting
The Government accepts that he cannot currently return to his homeland and provides him with accommodation and benefits as well as free NHS treatment, at least until his judicial review challenge is decided.
Last night Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, warned: "Our services are dangerously overstretched already due to mismanagement, waste and inaccurate population statistics.

"We simply cannot afford to foot the bill for anyone who turns up on our doorstep - and it is especially wrong that illegal immigrants or those who have been refused asylum should be paid for at the expense of law-abiding taxpayers.

"The NHS struggles to provide a good standard of care even for those for whom it is intended.

"The further burden of illegal immigrants and the inevitable flood of health migrants would be the straw that broke the camel's back."

The case continues today, when the Department of Health will argue for the current law remaining the same and the judge is expected to give his decision.

Recent figures showed that the rate of asylum removals has fallen to a six-year low as the number of new arrivals rises to its highest level since 2005.

With immigration officers busy deporting foreign criminals, the vast backlog of asylum deportations - estimated at half a million - is growing rapidly again.

In the last quarter of 2007 a total of 8,140 asylum claims were made. Deportations of failed asylum seekers fell to 2,965 in the same period, the lowest figure since early 2002.

Judge Mitting

John Mitting